What is the Carbon Footprint of mining Bitcoin? Just how much carbon dioxide do we produce when we mine a bitcoin? It’s becoming an increasingly important question.
After all, it’s great to disrupt an inefficient and sometimes corrupt incumbent economic system, but most of us would rather not do it at the expense of the planet.
The bitcoin network is stuck in a circle that drives up its mining usage. People tend to put more computing power on the network so that they can make more more bitcoins. The bitcoin underpinning the network reacts by changing a parameter that makes it more difficult to solve the mathematical problem needed to solve a bitcoin block.
Because it’s harder to solve the problem, people add even more computing power, and so on. As this cycle increases, it takes more electricity to mine a bitcoin. The hashing power of the network surpassed the world’s top supercomputers almost a year ago, and things have moved along quite a bit since then. Some might call this a vicious circle. Nick Gogerty, who conceived a coin for trading solar energy production called solarcoincalls it the Red Queen problem.
In the Queen’s race everyone runs faster, but you never get ahead,” he says. All of the participants are co-adapting.
Want to add to the discussion?
You have to carbon adapting to keep up. Mining in Brisbane, Australia, Lane is also the founder of Bitcarbon. That site contains his method for tracking bitcoin-based carbon emissions. This makes carbon very difficult to ascertain the true carbon cost, because there bitcoin so many different types of equipment running the mining software. Still, it doesn’t stop him bitcoin.
That electricity cost will naturally vary with the price of a bitcoin. The result is that for every megawatt MW of electricity spent mining bitcoins, 0.
The method maps these figures against average electricity prices, to produce an average carbon intensity of 6.